 
                                        Concrete is the most important construction material in terms of volume and turnover. Its success comes, among other reasons, from its amazing versatility and its availability in most parts of this planet, being essentially a local material. However, this XXIst century sees humanity facing its most difficult challenge since its appearance on this planet: how to keep it livable for the next generations, with a population approaching ten billions of inhabitants, and a general shortage of non-renewable resources? Most informed people agree nowadays with the necessity of turning from linear to circular economy. Concrete cannot miss this major paradigm change.
The British Standards Concrete Committee wished to introduce 
provisions for recycled aggregates into its concrete standard 
(BS8500-2), but before it could do so a number of questions needed to be
 answered. Research undertaken at the University of Dundee provided 
answers to the questions raised by British Standards Institution (BSI) 
and this led to the introduction in 2002 of a full specification for the
 product and use of coarse recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) and a 
partial specification for other types of coarse recycled aggregates 
(RA).
The reason for the high use of RCA in the UK and the 
Netherlands is that the Governments took measures to make the use of RCA
 competitive with primary materials. One key measure was the 
introduction of landfill taxes. This would be an effective measure in 
India to reduce the volume of construction and demolition waste provided
 ‘fly tipping’ can be minimised.
Since 2002 the requirements for 
the use of coarse RCA and RA have only had very minor changes, but the 
requirements for the composition of the aggregate and the test method 
have been transferred from the BS8500-2 to the European aggregates 
standards.
Most studies have paid attention to the analysis of concrete with 
recycled aggregates (RA) that come from one source only. In some of 
them, recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) were used whereas in others RA 
from construction and demolition waste (CDW) were employed. However, in 
both cases, aggregates from different sources are not used, which does 
not allow evaluating the variation of the results.
With this 
research, one of the main objectives is to evaluate the variation of the
 properties of concretes when incorporating (fine and coarse) RA from 
five different CDW recycling plants.
Also, the properties of the 
natural and recycled aggregates used in the production of the concrete 
mixes are analyzed. For this purpose, composition, chemical and physical
 tests were performed.
In order to evaluate the concrete 
produced, compressive and tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, 
resistance to wear, immersion and capillary water absorption, resistance
 to chloride ions penetration and carbonation and shrinkage tests were 
carried out.
The analysis allowed concluding that the results 
significantly varied according to the RA family used, mainly when the 
fine aggregates were replaced. Furthermore, it was found that the great 
majority of the properties of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) are 
lower than those of the corresponding (reference) natural aggregate 
concrete (NAC).
Several successful demonstration projects have been conducted in the 
past 20 years in order to verify the practical, technical and 
environmental applicability of recycled aggregates. One example is 
Sørumsand High School where 37% of the natural coarse aggregates were 
replaced by recycled concrete aggregates. The project was well-planned 
with solid documentation of the recycled materials as well as the fresh 
and hardened concrete properties. The experiences obtained were that the
 project was competitive to the regular project with natural aggregates 
with regard to costs, technical performance, practical handling and 
environmental properties. Furthermore, recycled aggregates are included 
for use in nearly all of the European (EN) aggregate standards, though 
at varying implementation level. In India, a large deficiency of 
treatment and recycling capacity of C&D waste exists. Recycling by 
the wet process technology seems to increase, due to the highly complex 
heterogenic waste received at the stationary plants. Heterogeneity 
should be tackled by increased source segregation, pre-mixing of 
feedstock materials and a daily control of the recycled products. 
Homogenous feedstock source of concrete waste is highly applicable to 
recycle into RCA.
One of the challenges of concrete technology is to minimize cement 
clinker, responsible for 8% of the manmade CO2emissions globally and 
maximize other constituents emerging from waste, such as recycled 
aggregates, which belong to the construction, demolition and excavation 
waste (CDEW) stream or fly ash, which belongs to the industrial waste 
stream, according to European regulations. There is another form of 
waste, however, that has received limited attention, so far, and this is
 namely marble dust and solids. This waste stream is either derived from
 demolition and crushing of architectural parts made of marble and 
therefore belongs to the CDEW waste stream or it is produced during the 
cutting and shaping of marble in industrial units and can be found in 
the form of dust (water marble dust - WMD) or slurry. The present paper 
offers a new perspective of the waste stream classification and a review
 on the re-use and recycling methods and case studies suggested by 
scholars. Lastly, at the same time, potential extensions to the current 
state-of the-art in the field of valorization of the waste stream of 
marble dust, solids or slurry are discussed.
This paper presents the effects of supplementary cementitious 
materials (SCMs) (Fly ash, slag and silica fume) and emerging nano- and 
ultrafine-materials (nano silica and ultrafine fly ash) on mechanical 
properties of concrete containing 50% recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) as
 partial replacement of natural coarse aggregate. The RCA are mixed 
construction and demolition (C&D) waste consisted of concrete, 
masonry and other materials. In the first part, the effects of 50% slag 
or 50% fly ash as partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) 
in concrete containing 50% RCA is evaluated, while in second part the 
effects of 5, 10 and 15% silica fume on above recycled aggregate 
concrete containing 50% slag or 50% fly ash are evaluated. In third 
part, the effects of 2% nano silica (NS) and 10% ultrafine fly ash 
(UFFA) on concrete containing 50% RCA are evaluated. The above results 
are compared with control concrete containing 100% and 50% natural 
coarse aggregate. Water-to-binder ratios of all concrete are kept 
constant, however, superplasticizer is added in the mixes containing 
silica fume, nano silica and ultra fine fly ash to improve the 
workability. The compressive and indirect tensile strengths of all 
concrete are measured at 7, 28, 56 and 91 days. The results show that 
due to addition of 50% RCA the compressive strength of concrete at all 
ages is reduced significantly compared to control concrete containing 
100% natural coarse aggregates. The addition of high volume fly ash and 
slag further reduced the compressive strength of recycled aggregate 
concrete at all ages, where high volume fly ash shows more reduction in 
compressive strength than high volume slag. The addition of silica fume 
is, however, recovered the compressive strength reduction of both high 
volume fly ash and slag concretes containing 50% RCA. The addition of 
nano silica and ultrafine fly ash also improved the compressive strength
 of recycled aggregate concrete. Similar results are also observed in 
the case of indirect tensile strength. The carbon footprint of recycled 
aggregate concrete is slightly higher than the control concrete. 
However, the addition of SCMs reduced the carbon footprint 
significantly.
Inkjet (Powder-based) three-dimensional printing (3DP) shows 
significant promise in concrete construction applications. The accuracy,
 speed, and capacity to build complicated geometries are the most 
beneficial features of inkjet 3DP. Therefore, inkjet 3DP needs to be 
carefully studied and evaluated with construction goals in mind and 
employed in real-world applications, where it is most appropriate. This 
paper focuses on the important aspect of curing 3DP specimens. It 
discusses the enhanced mechanical properties of the mortar that are 
unlocked through a heat-curing process. Experiments were conducted on 
cubic mortar specimens that were printed and cured in an oven at a range
 of different temperatures (40, 60, 80, 90, 100°C). The results of the 
experimental tests showed that 80°C is the optimum heat-curing 
temperature to achieve the highest compressive strength and flexural 
strength of the printed mortar specimens. These tests were performed on 
two different dimensions of the cubic specimens, namely, 20x20x20 mm, 
50x50x50 mm and on prism specimens with dimensions of 160x40x40 mm. The 
inkjet 3DP process and the post-processing curing are discussed. In 
addition, 3D scanning of the printed specimens was employed and the 
surface roughness profiles ofthe 3DP gypsum specimens and cement mortar 
are recorded 13.76 µm and 22.31µm, respectively
Estimates of Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste generation 
in India range between 150 to 716 million tonnes/year. C&D debris 
recycling, one of the sustainable solutions for managing this sector of 
waste, is gaining popularity worldwide. However, very few recycling 
facilities are available in India presently to handle C&D debris. 
Several barriers, such as inadequate regulations, lack of incentives and
 awareness about recycling techniques, and unavailability of guidelines 
have been reported to hinder setting up recycling facilities in India. 
However, the influence of human factors, such as attitude and industry 
norms, have been overlooked in the existing literature. The primary 
objective of this paper is to evaluate the viability of a business model
 in the construction materials market in India for recycling operations 
and products. Different stakeholders of C&D waste recycling 
operations, such as construction & demolition contractors (waste 
generators), government engineers, architects and RMC producers were 
interviewed to understand their perspectives towards recycling and 
recycled products. A total of 67 open-ended semi-structured interviews 
across six major cities comprise part of the primary evidence. The 
customer discovery process of the lean startup methodology and related 
tools were employed to analyze the qualitative interview data. It was 
found that rewards in the industry for green products and services are 
negligible and inconsistent. The stiff competition offered by natural 
aggregate-based products necessitates price restrictions on any new 
entrants. Supply chain costs of waste acquisition and processing pose a 
big challenge owing to the lack of stringent regulations and 
enforcement. Quality concerns and usage restrictions might make direct 
selling of recycled aggregates unattractive. Value-added products, such 
as paver blocks made of recycled aggregates, present an attractive 
channel for recycled materials to enter the market. Challenges hindering
 the adoption of recycled aggregates and the ways in which government 
support could benefit recyclers by off-setting supply chain costs to 
make recycled products competitive are discussed.
 
 
                  November 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 11
 
 
                  October 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 10
 
 
                  September 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 09
 
 
                  August 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 08
 
 
                  July 2025  
 Volume - 99 
Number : 07
 
 
                  June 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 06
 
 
                  May 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 05
 
 
                  April 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 04
 
 
                  March 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 03
 
 
                  February 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 02
 
 
                  January 2025  
 Volume - 99
Number : 01
