Page 80 - ICJ Jan 2023
P. 80

TECHNICAL PAPER                                            COLLECTOR’S EDITION





                                  (i)  Even  when  the  recycled  concrete  is  of      (iii)  When the recycled concrete of richer mix
                                      same mix  as that of parent concrete         (example,  1:2:4)  is  made  with  aggregate
                                      (example 1:1½:3), the strength of recycled   taken from leaner parent concrete  mix
                                      aggregate concrete is relatively lower. In   (e.g. 1:4:7), the bond is between recycled
                                      the  case  of  parent  concrete  the  bond is   aggregate coated with leaner mortar
                                      between the fresh granite aggregate and      (1:4) and the richer mortar of the recycled
                                      mortar,  whereas  in  the  case  of recycled   concrete (1:2).
                                      concrete  the bond is  between mortar
                                      adhering to the aggregate and the mortar   The above bond characteristics between recycled
                                      of  the  recycled  concrete  (different  age
                                      though of same mix, that is, 1:1½).   aggregates  and mortar  of recycled  concrete
                                                                            contribute to  the  relatively  lower strength of
                                  (ii)  When  the  recycled  concrete  of  leaner   recycled  aggregate  concrete.  These  difference
                                      mix  (e.g.  1:4:7)  is  made  with  aggregate   in bond characteristics  require further  in-depth
                                      taken from richer parent concrete mix   study.
                                      (e.g., 1:2:4), the bond is between recycled
                                      aggregate coated with richer mortar (1:2)
                                      and the  leaner  mortar  of the  recycled   The results presented in this paper  pertain only
                                      concrete (1:4).                       to  one  workability  (that  is,  a  low-workability
                                                                            with a compacting factor of around 0.85) chosen
                                                                            specifically  to  study  the  relative  behaviour  of
                              Table 4: Strength or original and recycled
                              aggregate concrete.                           different types of recycled aggregates with various
                                                                            mix proportions, and hence it should be noted
                                Original mix  Recycled mix  Compressive
                                proportion*   proportion     strength,      that the variations in water content will affect the
                                                               2
                                                          N/mm  at 28 days  strength of recycled aggregate concrete.
                                   1:1½:3     original mix     49.80
                                                1:l½:3         40.00
                                                1:2:4          36.35        CONCLUSIONS
                                                1:3:5          32.20
                                                1:4:7          25.70        1.  Recycled  aggregates  possess  relatively  lower
                                   1:2:4      original mix     41.50           bulk density and higher water absorption as
                                                1:l½:3         32.16
                                                1:2:4          25.00           compared to those of fresh granite aggregates.
                                                1:3:5          22.70           This  is  mainly  due to  the  porous  mortar
                                                1:4:7          18.60
                                   1:3:5      original mix     32.70           adhering to  the  recycled  concrete  aggregate
                                                1:l½:3         24.20           and the relatively higher porosity of bricks.
                                                1:2:4          20.90
                                                1:3:5          15.40        2.  Though the impact value of recycled concrete
                                                1:4:7          13.10           aggregate and both impact and crushing
                                   1:4:7      original mix     22.00           values of two types of recycled brick masonry
                                                1:l½:3         15.80
                                                1:2:4          10.60           aggregates  are  exceeding  the  BIS  specified
                                                1:3:5          9.40            limits, it has been shown, through the range of
                                                1:4:7          7.30
                                                                               compressive strengths obtained, that recycled
                              *Original mix indicates the concrete made using fresh   concrete of different mixes made with recycled
                              granite aggregate (from which recycled aggregate has   aggregates obtained from i) demolished brick
                              been made)                                       masonry can be used for manufacture of load
                                                                               bearing masonry units and PCC works, and ii)
                              #
                               Recycled mix indicates the mix of the new concrete
                              using recycled aggregate from original mix.      demolished concrete aggregates can be used
                                                                               for both PCC and RC construction.



                                                                        The Indian Concrete Journal | November 2018  81
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85