Page 10 - Open Access December - 2025
P. 10

POINT OF VIEW


           emissions requires an integrated, collaborative approach that   the legislative and supply chain issues”, in Green Energy
           encompasses supply chains, operational practices, and post-use   and Technology, Springer, London, United Kingdom,
           material recovery.                                         pp. 5-27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5376-4_2.
                                                                  [4]   Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
           13.  CONCLUSION AND STRATEGIC                              (DEFRA) (2016). “UK statistics on waste”, Government
           RECOMMENDATIONS                                            Statistical Service, London, United Kingdom.

            In response to the growing need for circularity in construction,   [5]   Huang, S., Liu, X., Xu, J., Li, H., and Zhao, Y. (2022). “Plastic
           this paper developed a decision-making framework (Figure 1)   waste management strategies and their environmental
           that provides a systematic approach for evaluating construction   aspects: A scientometric analysis and comprehensive
           materials in line with circular economy principles. Using six   review”, International Journal of Environmental Research
           screening criteria (Table 1), the framework assesses materials’   and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 8, Article No. 4556,
           potential for reuse, guiding them through a decision point   pp. 1-20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084556.
           towards one of four pathways: reuse, recycle, downcycle,   [6]   Ellis, L. D., Badel, A. F., Chiang, M. L., Park, R. J. Y., and
           or landfill. This structured, replicable process facilitates   Chiang, Y. M. (2020). “Toward electrochemical synthesis of
           informed material selection, reinforces the principle of material   cement—An electrolyzer-based process for decarbonating
                      [27]
           custodianship   by encouraging stakeholders to maintain
           responsibility for materials throughout their lifecycle, and   CaCO 3  while producing useful gas streams”, Proceedings
           ensures that circular economy goals are operationalised in   of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
           practice.                                                  States of America, Vol. 117, No. 23, pp. 12584-12591.
                                                                      doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821673116.
           The paper further examined the role of green public    [7]   Çetin, S., Raghu, D., Honic, M., Straub, A., and Gruis, V.
           procurement as a policy lever to promote the selection of   (2023). “Data requirements and availabilities for material
           sustainable, reusable materials and assessed the implications   passports: A digitally enabled framework for improving the
           of Scope 3 emissions for accountability across supply chains. By   circularity of existing buildings”, Sustainable Production
           identifying technical, economic, organisational, and regulatory   and Consumption, Vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.
           barriers and enablers, alongside digital innovations such as   spc.2023.07.011.
           material passports, the study integrates theoretical insights with
           practical guidance. Academically, this work provides a rigorous   [8]   Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2021). “What is a circular
           framework and synthesis for future research, while policymakers,   economy?”, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, United
           practitioners, and educators in the built environment benefit   Kingdom. (Accessed on 15 September 2025 from https://
           from actionable strategies to advance sustainable, resource-  www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-
           efficient construction.                                    economy-introduction/overview).

           ACKNOWLEDGMENT                                         [9]   Li, H., Bao, W., Xiu, C., Zhang, Y., and Xu, H. (2010).
                                                                      “Energy conservation and circular economy in China’s
           This paper is an output of the funded research project titled  process industries”, Energy, Vol. 35, No. 11, pp. 4273-4281.
           "Towards a Circular Economy: Exploring nanotechnology, plastics,   doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.04.021.
           and additive manufacturing for the production of sustainable
           concrete". The authors gratefully acknowledge the various   [10]  Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. do C. D., and Tavares, S. F.
           support received, including funding from UKIERI and SPARC.  (2020). “Circular economy in the construction industry:
                                                                      A systematic literature review”, Journal of Cleaner
           REFERENCES                                                 Production, Vol. 276, Article No. 121046, pp. 1-19.
                                                                      doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046.
           [1]   Barbosa, F., Woetzel, J., Mischke, J., and Ribeirinho, M. J.
               (2017). “Reinventing construction through a productivity   [11]  Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., and Ulgiati, S. (2016). “A review on
               revolution”, McKinsey and Company Report, London,      circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced
               United Kingdom, pp. 1-30.                              interplay of environmental and economic systems”,
           [2]   World Resources Institute (2022). “Climate watch historical   Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 11-32.
               GHG emissions”, World Resources Institute, Washington,   doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
               DC, USA. (Accessed on 15 September 2025 from https://  [12]  Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., and Seppälä, J. (2018).
               www.climatewatchdata.org).                             “Circular economy: The concept and its limitations”,
           [3]   Udeaja, C., Ekundayo, D., Zhou, L., and Perera, S. (2013).   Ecological Economics, Vol. 143, No. 1, pp. 37-46.
               “Material waste in the construction industry: A review of   doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041.


        16    THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | DECEMBER 2025
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15