Page 11 - Open-Access-Nov-2020
P. 11

TECHNICAL PAPER


           Table 1: Condition of corroded PTC structures at various stages of corrosion detection

            NAME AND LOCATION OF              STAGE OF   OBSERVATION UPON DETAILED            CONSEQUENCE (AGE AT THE
            BRIDGE  (REFERENCE)               DETECTION  INVESTIGATION                        TIME OF DETECTION, YEARS)
            Boundary Creek Bridge, New Zealand  [1]  Cracking  •  Localized wire breakage     Strand removal
                                                         •  Hidden corrosion                  (≈ 48)

            Tiwai Point Bridge, New Zealand  [1]  Cracking  •  Up to 60% estimated section loss  Decommissioning
                                                         •  Hidden corrosion                  (≈ 40)
            Hamanatua Stream Bridge, New Zealand  [2]  Spalling   •  Up to 10% estimated section loss  Significant repair
                                                         •  Hidden corrosion                  (≈ 38)
            Lowe’s Motor Speedway Pedestrian Bridge,   Collapse   •  Pre-mixed Calcium Chloride set accelerator  Human injury
            North Carolina  [3]                          •  Hidden corrosion                  (≈ 5)


           bridges are young (say, couple of decades old), their long-  Also, if the flow of corrosion along the length of the interstitial
           term performance issues are not yet widely reported. Some   spaces (in the direction of strands) is considered, the critical loss
           well-documented cases of corrosion-induced premature failure   in cross-section could be much more than 6%. This is evident
           of PTC members in bridges are presented in Table 1. As given,   from the significant cross-sectional loss shown in Figure 1(b), in
           the consequences of corrosion of PTC girders in New Zealand   which case no surface stains were observed. Strand breakage
           were severe with significant repair and decommissioning in   is also a recurrent observation from PTC structures that have
           about 40 years of age. Although the corrosion-induced collapse   failed much before the expected service life; and that too
           of the bridge in North Carolina at five years of age was due to   without any corrosion stains on the concrete surface [as shown
           pre-mixed calcium chloride accelerator, which is an extreme   in Figure 1(c)]. Therefore, if interventions are not made before
           case, the incident provides an indication on the possible brittle/  the strand corrodes, the load carrying capacity can reduce
           catastrophic failure mode and high risk/safety concerns.  significantly because of the vicious series of wire breakage à
                                                                  stress redistribution à strand breakage, resulting in catastrophic
           In case of conventional steel rebars, the corrosion products start   failures  [1,3,7–9] . According to fib Bulletin 26, over 40% of failures in
           exerting expansive stresses onto the surrounding concrete when   PTC can be attributed to unsatisfactory corrosion protection or
           the thickness of the rust layer reaches about 15 µm , leading   error in construction  [10] .
                                                    [4]
           to cracking/spalling etc. (depending on the pore structure of
           cover concrete). The corrosion products ooze out and reach   2.  SERVICE-LIFE BASED DESIGN (SLD) OF PTC
           the concrete surface causing brown stains, which is usually
           considered as a sign of corrosion by the inspectors. However,   Uncontaminated concrete cover provides a physical barrier
           the case with corrosion of the seven-wire prestressed steel   against ingress of corrosive species and also the alkaline
           strands is different. The corrosion products fill the interstitial   chemical environment (pH ≈ 13) for passivation of embedded
           spaces between the wires [as shown in Figure 1(a)] prior to   steel  [11] . The passive film is believed to be a protective oxide
           exerting pressure on the surrounding concrete and cracking it.   or hydroxide film that reduces the rate of dissolution of
           Therefore, visible signs of strand corrosion will not be observed   steel to negligible ranges  [12–14] . Once the passive film breaks
           on the concrete surface at least upto about 6% cross-sectional   down, active corrosion of steel bars begins and the corrosion
           loss – making timely detection of corrosion challenging  [5,6] .   products, being expansive, can cause cracking and then further

                                                                                          Broken strand; but, predominantly
                                                                                          unstained  concrete at locations away
                                                                                          from the stirrups





           Cross-sectional loss in  Filling up of the
           the interstitial space  interstitial space
                                           Note: Arrows indicate severe section loss
           (a) Interstitial spaces filled with corrosion   (b) Severe localized hidden corrosion and section    (c) The soffit of a 50 year old bridge
           products prior to exerting pressure onto   loss observed on prestressed wires in a 40 year old    girders showing strand breakage due
                                                                                                                 [1]
                                        [5]
           the surrounding concrete (adapted from )      bridge (adapted from )              to corrosion (adapted from )
                                                                         [1]
                                      Figure 1: Insidious and hidden nature of strand corrosion in PTC systems

                                                                           THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | NOVEMBER 2020  55
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16