Page 8 - Open-Access-Nov-2020
P. 8

TECHNICAL PAPER


           If the corrosion rate is not constant, then it has been identified   phenomenon, which can mislead many of the apparently straight
           that the propagation period can be modelled by considering   forward deductions. In large structures, the measurement of the
           an increase or a decrease of the corrosion rate with the time.   corrosion rate entails a set of difficulties due to the spraying of
           This enables to have an expression with “two linear periods or a   the applied current along the bars to a distance, which changes
           bi-linear model” (Figure 12).                          with the concrete resistivity and the level of corrosion in the
                                                                  measurement region. It is necessary to confine the current
                 =   1 +  2 =  1  +  2                  (11)      below the auxiliary electrode, which needs sophisticated
                               1     2
                                                                  equipement with control of the external guard ring. The
           Where t p  is the propagation period showing two lineal   simultaneous inherent measurement of the corrosion potential
           trends t p1  and t p2 , P corr1  and P corr2  are the loss in bar diameter   and the resistivity are helpful for the correct interpretation of the
           or “accumulated corrosion” in each of the two propagation   measurements. Providing a correct value of the corrosion rate
           sub-period, V corr1  and V corr2  are the corresponding corrosion rates   is obtained on site, its application for predicting the evolution
           in each sub-periods.                                   of the loss in bar diameter needs the consideration on whether
                                                                  the attack is homogeneous or localized and whether the future
           The change in the slope of the corrosion penetration (Figure 12)   evolution will evolve with the same corrosion rate or not. That
           may be originated by different phenomena, in general due to   is which is the averaged annual value as a function of the local
           the cracking of the cover due to the expansion of the oxides.   climate conditions.
           When parallel cracks are developed, for example in submerged
           conditions, the chlorides may arrive in greater quantity to   5.  REFERENCES
           the bar surface and then, the corrosion rate would increase.
           If however, the concrete is exposed to the atmosphere, the   [1]   Tuutti, K., (1982). “Corrosion of steel in concrete”, Swedish
           generation of parallel cracks may induce a shorter time of   Cement and Concrete Research Institute, Stockholm.
           wetness because the region of the crack, may dry quicker than   [2]   Elsener, B., Andrade, C., Gulikers, J., Polder, R., Raupach,
           the bulk concrete and the crack would have a shorter wetness   M. (2003). “RILEM TC 154-EMC: Electrochemical
           period and the corrosion rate would decrease. Nevertheless, this   techniques for measuring metallic corrosion Half-
           decrease would depend on the time by year that the cracked   Cell Potential Measurements – Potential Mapping on
           zone is exposed to the rain. If the wetness period by year is long,
           then the corrosion rate may not decrease, but increase, in the   Reinforced Concrete Structures”, Vol. 36, pp. 461-471.
           cracked zones due to the corrosion exposed to the atmosphere.  [3]   Polder, R.; Andrade, C.; Elsener, B.; Vennesland, O.;
                                                                      Gulikers, J.; Weidert, R.; and Raupach, M.; (2000),
           4.  FINAL COMMENTS                                         “Test methods for onsite measurement of resistivity
                                                                      of concrete”, RILEM TC 154-EMC: Electrochemical
           The on-site corrosion measurements in concrete structures
           demand some specialization. The expertise required is not for   techniques for measuring metallic corrosion”, Materials
           the measurement using correct equipments, but mainly for the   and Structure, Vol. 33, pp. 603-611.
           interpretation of test data. The corrosion evolution is a complex   [4]   Andrade, C., Alonso, C., Gulikers, J., Polder, R., Cigna,
                                                                      R., Vennesland, Ø, Salta, M., Raharinaivo, A., Elsener, B.
                                                       C
                                                                      (2004). “RILEM TC 154-EMC: Electrochemical Techniques
                                                                      for Measuring Metallic Corrosion. Recommendations Test
                                                                      methods for on-site corrosion rate measurement of steel
                                                       A
                                                                      reinforcement in concrete by means of the polarization
                                                                      resistance method”, Materials and Structures, Vol. 37,
              Pcorr (mm)                               B          [5]   Vennesland Ø., Raupach M., Andrade, C., (2007).
                                                                      No. 273, pp. 623-643.

                                                                      “Recommendation of Rilem TC 154-EMC: Electrochemical
                                                                      techniques for measuring corrosion in concrete-
                                                                      Measurements with embedded probes”, Materials and
                                                                      Structures, Vol. 40, pp. 745-758.
                                  t p1   t ip2
                                                       time       [6]   ASTM G59. (2014). “Standard Test Method for Conducting
                     initiation        Propagation                    Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements”.
            Figure 12: Linear progression of corrosion depth (line A) and the two   [7]   ASTM C876. (2015). “Standard Test Method for Corrosion
             possibilities of “two-step (bi-lineal)” corrosion propagation models
           (line B with a lowering of the corrosion rate in the second step and line    Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete”,
                          C with an increase of it in time)           West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.


        14    THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | NOVEMBER 2020
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13