Page 7 - Open-Access-September-2020
P. 7

TECHNICAL PAPER



                           160
                                                    Experimental, B-1                     Experimental, B-2
                                                  Energy ratio = 85.9%                   Energy ratio = 92%
                           120

                          Load (kN)  80



                            40


                             0

                           160
                                                    Experimental, B-3                     Present approach
                                                  Energy ratio = 73.4%                 Energy ratio = 89.6%
                           120

                          Load (kN)  80



                            40


                             0
                                                              3
                                                   2
                               00        100       200        30 0  0         10         20        30
                                         1
                                          Deflection (mm)                        Deflection (mm)
                       Figure 8: Energy ratios for the BFRP-PSC beams tested and theoretically obtained from the present design approach
           as elastic linear material, by specifying its elastic modulus,
           Poisson’s ratio, ultimate tensile strength, and plastic strain at       Loading wedges
           failure. For the BFRP tendons, the ultimate tensile strength was
           defined as 1116 MPa, the plastic strain was defined close to
           zero as 10 , and the elastic modulus was defined as 50.84 GPa.
                   –5
           The elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the steel, used for                    Assembly
           stirrups, were defined as 210 GPa and 0.3, respectively. All
           the reinforcements were embedded inside the concrete host
           element. The prestressing forces were applied as initial stresses
           to the tendons in the predefined field. The prestressing forces
           here were 60% (669.6 MPa) of the ultimate tensile strength of the      Support pin
           BFRP tendons as applied in the experimental work, and were                          Mesh
           equal to the effective prestressing forces after accounting for
           the prestress losses in the present design approach. Thus, the
           comparison of the results obtained from (a) experimental work,
           (b) present analytical design approach, and (c) finite element-
           based numerical simulation was made for the same total
           prestressing force of 669.6 MPa. The numerical simulation was
           carried out in four stages such as (i) prestressing applied, (ii) self-             Reinforcement cage
           weight imposed, (iii) applied load before reaching the ultimate
           load-carrying capacity, and (iv) loading in the post-peak stage.
           The displacement-control loading was applied to capture the
           failure of the beam and its behavior in the post-peak stage. The
           finite element (FE) model of the beam developed in ABAQUS    Figure 9: Finite element (FE) model of the BFRP-PSC beam in ABAQUS
                                                            ®
                                                                                                                    ®
           environment is shown in  Figure 9.                                          environment

                                                                            THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | JANUARY 2021  25
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12