Page 8 - Open-Access-September-2020
P. 8

TECHNICAL PAPER


                                                                 1600                                    40
                         Load-carrying capacity  First rupture       Lowest prestressing tendon (1)  FEM    (1)  Present approach
                     120                        Second rupture       Second prestressing tendon (2)  FEM    (2)  Present approach
                                                                                         FEM    (3)
                                                                     Bottom non-prestressing tendons (3)
                                                                                               Present approach
                                                      Third      1200  Extreme compressionfiber (c)  FEM  30
                                                      rupture
                    Load (kN)  80  Cracking load               Tensile stress in tendons (MPa)  800  First  Second  Third  20 Compressive stress in concrete (MPa)
                                                                                           rupture
                                                                                                  rupture
                                                                              rupture
                      40
                                  Present approach               400                                    10
                                  Experimental, B-1
                                  Finite element (FE) analysis
                      0                                            0                                     0
                        0          10          20         30        0          10          20          30
                                    Deflection (mm)                              Deflection (mm)
                                        (a)                                          (b)
                                     Figure 10: (a) Load-deflection curves obtained from different approaches and
                                (b) Variation in tensile and compressive stresses in the tendons and concrete with deflection
           The results obtained from the finite element (FE) analysis are   1.   The load-carrying capacity of the BFRP-prestressed
           compared with the analytical results obtained using the present   concrete beam, estimated based on the unified design
           design approach and the experimental findings. The load-   approach, is in a good agreement with that using the
           deflection responses obtained from the different approaches   strain compatibility method. Moreover, the theoretical
           are shown in Figure 10(a). The results of the finite element   estimations of the load-carrying capacity, following both
           (FE) analysis show the failure of the beam in three stages, as   the analytical approaches, are in agreement with the
           anticipated in the present design approach, and the peak   experimental findings.
           loads with the corresponding deflection are found in a good
           agreement with the results of the present design approach with   2.   The load-deflection response of the BFRP-PSC beam,
           maximum differences of 10.7% and 21.4% for the peak loads   analytically obtained from the flexural design approach
           and deflections, respectively. However, the load-deflection   adopted, is in a good agreement with the experimental
           responses obtained from the present design approach as well   findings for the pre-failure zone; however, the estimation
           as the finite element (FE) analysis are not matching well with   of deflection, using this approach, deviated from the
           the experimentally measured counterparts in the post-peak   experimental findings in the post-peak zone, though, the
           stage, which can be attributed to the uncertainties in material   additional inelastic energy (area under the load-deflection
           properties and prestress losses. Figure 10(b) shows the variation   curve in the post-peak zone) is in a close agreement
           in tensile stress in the tendons and compressive stress in the   with the experimental results. Consequently, the ductility
           extreme compression concrete fiber with deflection of the beam.   evaluated from the presented design approach is
           The sequential rupturing of the BFRP tendons can be seen from   comparable owing to the successive/ progressive ruptures
           Figure 10(b), wherein the deflection values corresponding to the   of the BFRP tendons imparting higher nonlinearity.
           three ruptures of the tendons are matching with the deflection   3.   The partial prestressing of the concrete beam, designed
           values at the load drops in the FE load-deflection curve in   as an under-reinforced section, with two layers of the
           Figure 10(a). This testifies that the tendons did not rupture   BFRP tendons, vertically distributed along the depth of
           simultaneously in the design approach adopted here, instead,   the cross-section, resulted in a high energy ratio reached
           the sequential rupturing of the BFRP tendons imparted higher   to 89.6% and achieved an acceptable ductile behavior.
           nonlinearity in the flexural member, thereby enhancing the   Hence, the under-reinforced design can be recommended
           energy ratio, i.e., ductility.                             for the structural members partially prestressed with the
                                                                      BFRP tendons following the presented design approach.
           6.  CONCLUSIONS
                                                                  4.   The finite element (FE) simulation results are found in a
           Basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP)-prestressed concrete   good agreement with the results obtained from the current
           (PSC) beams were designed based on the analytical approach,   design approach, and showed the sequential rupturing of
           analyzed numerically, and tested experimentally. The flexural   the BFRP tendons, as intended in the design philosophy,
           behavior of the BFRP-PSC beams was investigated when the   in the post-peak zone. It therefore proved the efficacy of
           beams were under-reinforced, particularly from viewpoint of   the philosophy of the current flexural design by providing
           ductility achieved. The conclusions drawn from the present study   more ductility to the beam and introducing a kind of
           are as follows.                                            progressive failure.


        26    THE INDIAN CONCRETE JOURNAL | JANUARY 2021
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13